Jerk AlertPrivacy and the law
If you watch someone drive dangerously and want the state to know, two questions decide what happens next: are you allowed to tell them, and will they tell the driver it was you. We researched all 51 US jurisdictions against their own agency pages and forms to answer both. The answers are stranger, and more uneven, than we expected.
US jurisdictions where a witness unrelated to the driver has no confirmed way to report them to the licensing agency.
Most reporting routes were not built for a witness
Nearly every state has some machinery for pulling an unsafe driver in for re-examination. Almost all of it was designed around medical fitness — a doctor, a family member, or a police officer raising a concern about a specific person they know.
That shows up in what the forms ask for. They want the driver's full name, date of birth, and home address. A witness holding a plate number has none of those. It is not that the door is locked; it is that the door was cut for somebody else.
Six states are the exception, and their own forms say so. Utah's is the clearest: its Driver License Division states the form may be used to report drivers who may be unsafe due to frequent accidents, frequent disregard for traffic laws, or any driving actions observed that may affect driving safety. Arizona files its route under the heading Community Reporting and names friends, neighbours and coworkers as people who may use it.
Who is allowed to report
A named form, filed with the licensing agency, with no requirement that you know the driver. Texas puts it plainly on form DL-76: complete this form if you have personal knowledge about a driver you believe is no longer capable of safely operating a motor vehicle.
There is no citizen form. You write to the licensing unit yourself. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, New Jersey, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, New Mexico and the Dakotas work this way.
Illinois is the newest example: since 1 July 2026 an immediate family member — spouse, parent, grandparent, sibling or child — may file, and nobody else. Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Louisiana, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia and the District of Columbia restrict it similarly.
Alabama, Hawaii, Massachusetts, South Carolina and Wyoming. A physician, a court or a law enforcement officer can begin a review. A member of the public cannot, however clearly they saw what happened.
What happens to your name
This is the part almost nobody knows before they file, and it is where the states differ most. There is no national rule. The same act — writing to the state about a dangerous driver — leaves you anonymous in one state and hands the driver your home address in another.
Utah is unambiguous: the Division will not disclose the identity of the person notifying it. Louisiana is stronger still: the report is exempt from public-records disclosure, and neither its contents nor the submitter’s identity are divulged unless a court of competent jurisdiction orders it.
Maine is the model for how this ought to be worded — it tells you the truth in one sentence rather than implying a guarantee:
Georgia does not accept anonymous reports but honours a request for confidentiality “to the fullest extent possible”. Wisconsin has an open records law, so a driver can find out who filed — unless you sign a Pledge of Confidentiality in front of a DMV representative, and even then the DMV knows who you are and withholds it only as far as the law permits.
Connecticut's affidavit carries the notice in capitals on the form itself: this form is subject to disclosure to the licensee. Your name, address and telephone number are on it.
Texas is equally direct: everything submitted is subject to release under the Texas Public Information Act, or in response to a court order. In Iowa the driver can ask for the name and address of the person who filed. Kentucky's form will not be kept confidential and may be released to the person named if they ask. Montana does not accept anonymous or confidential reports at all, and the driver may request a copy of the recommendation.
Maryland deserves a note of its own, because it shows how a protection can be real and still run out. Anonymous reports are accepted — but before issuing a suspension the MVA must give the driver a hearing with the opportunity to cross-examine the person alleging they are unfit. Anonymity survives the filing and may not survive the case.
The trade nobody explains
Set those two findings side by side and the shape of the law becomes clear. Reporting a dangerous driver is not a protected anonymous act. It is a named one, in most places, and the protection you get in exchange is of a different kind.
Three states we researched say it outright in statute. Maine:
Connecticut's §14-46 provides that no civil action may be brought against any person who in good faith provides a report to the DMV. Arizona states the same immunity, though only for medical professionals. Louisiana protects doctors and anyone else who reports in good faith.
So the bargain the law strikes is this: every effort is made to keep you confidential, it cannot be guaranteed, and in exchange you cannot be sued for reporting honestly. That is a defensible trade. It is just not the trade most people think they are making, and no state explains it before you file.
Where Jerk Alert fits
Jerk Alert does not replace any of this. For a serious incident, report it to the state as well — and for a driver who is an active danger, call 911 first.
What Jerk Alert does is cover the case the state machinery was never built for: an ordinary driver, holding nothing but a plate number, who saw something and has nowhere to put it. A report is a plate, a place, one of 25 categories and a severity. It identifies a vehicle, not a person. We run no owner lookups and hold no DMV or identity data of any kind.
The question worth asking is not whether any of this is legal. It is why a restaurant can be rated by strangers and a driver cannot.
How we researched this
Each of the 51 jurisdictions was checked against its own agency pages and, where one exists, the citizen form itself. Every claim on a state page carries a source link, secondary sources are labelled as secondary, and a field we could not confirm is left out rather than guessed at. Where we could not find a route, the page says we could not find one.
The research is current as of 9 August 2026 and is not legal advice. Rules change; check the agency's own page before you file.
See all 51 statesJerk Alert LLC · How it works · Erk Score · Privacy & the law · Safety · States · Privacy · Terms · support@jerkalert.org